| [health/include/header_css.htm] | ||
|
|
||
LOW CARB DIET RESEARCH
Atkins Diet Home -
Why Atkins Works -
Atkins Diet Revolution - Four Phases of Atkins -
Phase 1 - Atkins Diet Induction -
Phase 2 - Ongoing Weight Loss -
Phase 3 - Pre Maintenance -
Phase 4 - Lifetime Maintenance -
Low Carb Research -
Atkins Diet Myths -
Alcohol with Atkins -
Atkins Net Carbs -
Glycemic Index -
Ketosis -
Atkins and Vitamins -
Atkins and Exercise -
Carbohydrates -
Dr. Atkins Death -
Site Map
THE HARVARD STUDY by ALVIN POWELL
A Harvard School of Public Health study may stand dieting wisdom on its head, after low-carbohydrate dieters lost more
weight than low-fat dieters despite eating 25,000 extra calories over a 12-week study period. The findings generated
national attention after Penelope Greene, a visiting scholar in the School of Public Health's Nutrition Department,
presented her research last week (Oct. 13) at the annual meeting of the North American Association for the Study of
Obesity, in Fort Lauderdale, Fla.
LOW CARB vs LOW FAT
The study, conducted with Walter Willett, Nutrition Department chair and Fredrick Stare Professor of Epidemiology
and Nutrition, put three groups of dieters on different regimens. They included a low-fat group, a low-carbohydrate
group that ate the same number of calories, and a third group on a similar low-carbohydrate plan that included 300 extra
calories a day. Participants in all three groups lost weight, Greene said, with the low-fat group losing an average
of 17 pounds and the low-carbohydrate group that ate the same number of calories losing 23 pounds. The biggest
surprise, however, was that the low-carbohydrate dieters eating extra calories lost more than those on the low-fat diet.
Participants in that low carbohydrate group lost an average of 20 pounds.
INVESTIGATOR IN A CHEF'S HAT
The study was carefully controlled for what participants ate over the 12 weeks. Rather than giving participants a list of
approved foods and quantities and setting them free, Greene had the food prepared fresh daily according to special
recipes at a Cambridge restaurant, Ristorante Marino. First Greene herself, then the restaurant's chefs, Prepared meals
from a meticulously crafted menu, and bagged them so participants could pick them up daily. Each bag, color-coded
and picked up in the early evening, contained that night's dinner, a snack, the next day's breakfast and lunch, and a
multivitamin/mineral supplement.
Greene said she and Juniper Devecis, a registered dietician, spent considerable time before the study began creating the menu, trying out different dishes and different preparations of the same dishes. Her aim was to make the meals tasty and as similar as possible even though people were eating very different diets. The result was that participants had similar meals throughout the study period, though portion sizes and preparation did vary. Greene selected aging baby-boomers as participants because of concern about increasing health threats from obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease as the boomers age. Page 2 | ||